| List | enters the Knesset | votes | seats | range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 99% | 18.9% | 24 | 14-38 | |
| > 99% | 18.1% | 22 | 11-42 | |
| 96% | 9.4% | 11 | 4-24 | |
| 98% | 7.0% | 9 | 5-15 | |
| 98% | 6.8% | 8 | 4-14 | |
| 95% | 5.9% | 7 | 0-12 | |
| 96% | 5.9% | 7 | 4-12 | |
| 95% | 5.8% | 7 | 4-12 | |
| 92% | 5.6% | 7 | 0-12 | |
| 83% | 4.7% | 5 | 0-10 | |
| 69% | 4.0% | 5 | 0-8 | |
| AIAmcha Yisrael | 46% | 3.5% | 0 | 0-9 |
| HHendel-Zelekha | 29% | 2.8% | 0 | 0-7 |
A list below 3.25% gets no seats: its votes are lost. Seven lists stand between 3 and 6%: much of the election is decided there.
The other lists stayed above 97% at every date: Yashar, Likud, The Democrats, Shas.
| List | enters the Knesset | votes | seats | range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 99% | 21.0% | 26 | 15-42 | |
| > 99% | 19.9% | 24 | 12-44 | |
| 97% | 10.5% | 12 | 5-26 | |
| > 99% | 7.8% | 9 | 5-16 | |
| > 99% | 7.5% | 9 | 5-15 | |
| 98% | 6.5% | 8 | 4-13 | |
| 97% | 6.4% | 7 | 4-13 | |
| 95% | 6.2% | 7 | 4-13 | |
| 89% | 5.2% | 6 | 0-11 | |
| AIAmcha Yisrael | 55% | 3.9% | 4 | 0-9 |
| HHendel-Zelekha | 36% | 3.1% | 0 | 0-8 |
A list below 3.25% gets no seats: its votes are lost. Three lists stand between 3 and 6%: much of the election is decided there.
The other lists stayed above 97% at every date: Yashar, Likud, The Democrats, Shas, United Torah Judaism.
| List | votes | seats | in 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likud | 23.41% | 32 | Likud |
| Yesh Atid | 17.79% | 24 | B'Yachad |
| Religious Zionism | 10.84% | 14 | Otzma Yehudit, Religious Zionism-Zehut |
| National Unity | 9.08% | 12 | Blue and White, not modelled |
| Shas | 8.25% | 11 | Shas |
| United Torah Judaism | 5.88% | 7 | United Torah Judaism |
| Yisrael Beytenu | 4.48% | 6 | Yisrael Beytenu |
| Ra'am | 4.07% | 5 | Ra'am |
| Hadash-Ta'al | 3.75% | 5 | Hadash-Ta'al-Balad |
| Labor | 3.69% | 4 | The Democrats |
| Meretz | 3.16% | 0 | The Democrats |
| Balad | 2.91% | 0 | Hadash-Ta'al-Balad |
| Jewish Home | 1.19% | 0 | none |
| New Economic Party | 0.29% | 0 | Hendel-Zelekha |
Benjamin Netanyahu's camp won 64 seats. Yashar and Amcha Yisrael did not exist. Benny Gantz's National Unity has broken up: Blue and White runs alone, New Hope joined Likud and Gadi Eisenkot founded Yashar.
| Election | Netanyahu camp at 61 | seats forecast | seats won | majority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2019 | 58% | 62 | 65 | yes |
| September 2019 | 23% | 57 | 55 | no |
| March 2020 | 2% | 56 | 58 | no |
| March 2021 | < 1% | 48 | 52 | no |
| November 2022 | 34% | 60 | 64 | yes |
The model rated the actual outcome as the most likely in 4 elections out of 5. Its Brier score, which measures the gap between stated probabilities and what happened, is 0.133; it would be 0.240 by always stating the average frequency of majorities. Lower is better.
A forecasting model is not one more poll. A poll surveys a sample and describes opinion at a given moment. A model surveys no one. It gathers what can be measured, published polls, past election results and the campaign context, and derives a distribution of possible outcomes with their probability. It does not say that a list will win 22 seats. It says within which range it will finish, and how likely each outcome is.
Two pollsters published on the same day can differ by several seats. The model aggregates every poll published since the lists were filed, giving more weight to the most recent, the largest and the pollsters that erred least in the past. It takes into account the last election, list by list, and the campaign context. When a source provides no reliable measurement, it does not count, and its share goes to the others.
Israeli polls erred at each of the five elections from 2019 to 2022. The model replays these real errors on today's polls, in both directions: it does not assume in advance that a camp will be underestimated. This is what gives each list its range and each outcome its probability.
Each simulation allocates the 120 seats under Israeli electoral law: 3.25% threshold, Bader-Ofer method and surplus agreements. Who governs is then read from the refusals to govern together that list leaders have stated publicly during the campaign.
Uncertainty is this model's product, never its flaw. The computation is exact and reproducible, and the model was replayed on the five elections from 2019 to 2022 without any setting being changed afterwards.
Results: Central Elections Committee. Polls: pollsters and broadcasters, reports filed with the Committee's register. Past elections: public compilations of 2019 to 2022 polls. Statements by list leaders: Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Ynet, Israel National News.
All rights belong to Le Millénaire SAS, 47 rue de Vivienne, 75002 Paris.
Model designed by
Project director: William Thay
Deputy project director: Pierre Clairé
Political and data analysis: Matthieu Hocque
Data analysis, mathematics and validation: Florian Gérard-Mercier